This unique collection of artworks spans two decades of Ben Quilty’s practice and commemorates his 20th year with Jan Murphy Gallery. This period is witness to defining moments in the artist’s career, presenting works that carry profound personal significance. This exhibition can play a key role in weaving a narrative around extensive bodies of work and drawing attention to pivotal moments of insight and personal agency. For audiences, they can offer a vivid and imaginative voyage, akin to immersing oneself in a book. These works have the capacity to lead the audience through the internal landscape of an artist’s mind, and are undeniably vital for charting, or at least endeavouring
to chart, the expansive language of an artist’s career. Certainly, as an artist, presenting two decades of work can evoke a sense of introspective unease. However, it should also be cherished as an opportunity to step back and see a whole picture of oneself. This particular articulation of Quilty’s career is punctuated by his portrait of Margaret Olley, not only a defining work in the artist’s trajectory, but a painting which has become a key part of how Olley herself is honoured, a revered figure within the Australian art community.
The earliest work in this exhibition is New York (2000), a vivid urban landscape captured during the artist’s first trip abroad. Often compared to Auerbach for his dedication to thick, textured, figurative painting, this work shares a profound resemblance to Auerbach’s Morning Crescent works. Filled with chaotic arrangements of street diagonals, towering buildings, and a frenzy of traffic, all amidst a vibrant glow of yellow, blue, orange, and red, New York, like Auerbach’s London landscapes, skilfully conveys a powerful sense of depth and perspective. Although Quilty, albeit self-deprecatingly, remembers a man in his mid-20s still living at home, meeting Kylie and being embarrassed to admit he’d never been overseas, perhaps in this radiant cityscape is a glimpse of the painter we would become so familiar with today.
Quilty’s application, removal, re-application of thick buttery oil paint is an impulsive drive, with an aim to convey an unarguable presence of the subject, some fundamental basis of actuality. Although his subjects are often a vehicle for social and political interrogations, throughout his practice there is also a tender and intimate nod to his ‘constant subjects’. A decade apart, Kylie asleep while I draw her (2010) and Kylie, a love letter (2020), the subject patiently lies while the artist consumes. There is distinctly a finer stroke in the latter work. Around 2020, Quilty created a series of poignant works in response to the bushfires that had a devastating impact on his local community and other areas across the country, which was closely followed by the global pandemic. This work on bodies held and displayed in cold spaces bled into a series on boxing and UFC. Operating tables, dining tables, fighting arenas, places for alienated subjects, and new ways to present tortured anatomies, steeped in friction, violence and ritual.
Another familiar face is Quilty’s son Joe. Ben created both of these as a new dad, likely feeling deranged with exhaustion and overcome with love. Joe, is captured in those years where communication is either a giggle or a scream, he has had his face smashed into the shape of a greasy works burger. One aspect of Quilty’s work that often goes unmentioned is how funny it can be. In Baby Joe (2007), he gazes at the viewer like a turtle hatchling, displaying characteristics of both an alien and a grumpy old man. Is he about to giggle or scream? This exhibition is deeply personal. These works serve as a reminder and an ongoing tribute to these constant subjects. An artist’s influences are often ordinary occurrences but, when applied correctly, have the gravity to ignite a more profound and existential conversation. While the work, Red XB (2006), echoes the iconic Torana series, which provided a window into chrome masculinity and petrolhead culture, was in fact painted after a Ford which was always parked outside a café that the young family frequented. Each painting might speak to a well-known series or theme, but they are all also woven intimately from the artist’s life.
For philosopher Simone de Beauvoir, being human was a creative enterprise, a work of art. She argued that it was not enough to shape oneself within the existing conditions of the world, but that one must also shape the conditions of the world itself. Today we recognise Quilty for his dutiful social and political commentary. This compulsion could perhaps be charted back to Bomber (2002). After completing a degree in feminist theory and digital studies, Quilty worked as a TV news editor. One of his responsibilities involved screening unfiltered foreign news feeds, many of which contained graphic footage of natural disasters and violent, politically charged scenes. He vividly recalls monitoring around 40 screens simultaneously, each streaming live footage from various parts of the world. His job was to filter out anything that might excessively disturb the home audience, guided by specific criteria mandated by corporate sponsorship agreements. Bomber was a significant painting, and one of five, that earned him the Brett Whiteley Travelling Art Scholarship, marking a pivotal moment in his career as an artist. In a sense, Bomber, and where it came from, foreshadows several of his later inquiries, represented here in Heba’s tiny jacket (2017), Homeland (2014), Conscript, (Private Phil Butler) (2014), Myuran (2012), and Trooper M, after Afghanistan (2012).
We can approach this collection of works as a comprehensive self-portrait. In his words, “the more closely I look at my own life, the easier it is to make work.” Quilty’s work promotes deep introspection, it is real, it is human. This approach may account for his ability to seamlessly integrate his own likeness with that of Cook and a skull. His acute awareness of his societal position transcends binary notions of right and wrong. He simply exists, flaws and all. While his work is inherently intertwined with its political context, Quilty does not aim to adopt an authoritative stance. Instead, he seems to produce deeply personal work in an endeavour to reconcile with it all.
Silhouette portraiture became popular during the mid-eighteenth century, hailed as a more affordable alternative to ivory portrait miniatures. Yet this new portraiture emerged alongside a revival in physiognomy, the ancient pseudo-scientific field which asserted that one’s appearance, especially facial features, might correspond to particular and innate personality traits. Suited to documenting features in a cold, ‘objective’ manner, the silhouette was easily absorbed by this field, and became forever entangled with emergent techniques in scientific racism and criminology. Today, the profile is essentially synonymous with the mugshot. Physiognomy, meanwhile, is undergoing yet another revival within the context of computer vision and machine learning.
The interior of a silhouette is of course entirely featureless, the figure shadowed by a hot white background. It withholds information, and is therefore error prone. As a tool of documentation it is therefore a paradox, anatomically precise, yet defined by significant blind spots. The viewer is drawn to the limited clues which might reveal something of the subject, dress, tension and posture, profile. Which details do we dwell on, and which do we neglect? Perhaps more importantly, what is being withheld by the silhouette, by those tracts of canvas which do not possess data? How is it that these absences manage to contribute? At this point we might be reminded of Quilty's long engagement with the Rorschach test. Hermann Rorschach developed his eponymous ink blot tests to draw out the patient’s pure subjectivity. His tests did so by being randomised, containing no reference to the actual world, no pre-existing information or meaning. An image from nowhere which would capture vulnerable first impressions. The tests worked (so he claimed) precisely because they created empty space.
In the silhouette and Rorschach, Ben is clearly preoccupied with the optical sciences of human psychology and cognition. Tests, techniques, disciplines and discredited pseudo-sciences which have all too often wielded immense power over individuals and populations. In Shadowed, he is swimming further into the unconscious. While Quilty has different intentions and ideas to the physiognomist, they both deal in faces, and pieces of faces. Here, the mouth in particular stands out. Buckteeth, fangs and mandibles are rendered in gouache and ink on paper, charcoal, graphite and oil on canvas. They are deconstructed and cruelly reassembled, he is inventing new expressions, conditions and yes, personalities.
Perhaps the central question then, in Shadowed, is the articulation of human difference, whether that be in our mental states or in our appearance. The vacuums and shadows generated by these processes are utilized fully, expressive tools and not accessories to form. Meanwhile, The Daughter, a familiar face for the artist, hums with a sickly incandescence, and might have belonged in Laloux’s Fantastic Planet (1973). In Facing up a bald head sits in the gloom like a lost asteroid, stretched, and cold.
A stunning art book of Quilty's most recent collection of paintings from his series 'Free Fall'
‘This series, titled "Free Fall", was heavily influenced by American realist George Bellows’ early 20th-century boxing series. Where Bellows looked to boxing, the premier bloodsport of his age, Quilty has turned to the modern phenomenon of the Ultimate Fighting Championships (UFC). Looking back on Quilty’s work in recent years, his ongoing exploration of heavily abstracted, tortured anatomies, perhaps it was inevitable these figures, or their kin, would end up in a fighting pit, aka the ‘UFC Octagon’. Crucially, while studying Bellows, Quilty revisited the iconic images taken by photojournalist (and cousin) Andrew Quilty of the 2005 Cronulla riots. Here, the beach and the Octagon are corresponding zones, symbolically potent places steeped in friction, violence and ritual.’ – from the Foreword by Milena Stojanovska
The underlying structure of each of these paintings is formed by Rorschach images. Rorschachs were originally meaningless mirrored images used in clinical psychiatry as an aid in the diagnosis of schizophrenia; the patient would offer an interpretation of the image which itself would be analysed and interpreted by the psychiatrist. With the diagnostic outcome significantly dependent on the interpretative biases and prejudices of the practitioner, there are conflicting views on its efficacy and accuracy.
However, interpretative instability is a potent lens through which to consider history. Specifically, the common rift between the version of history moulded and proliferated by the powerful, and the often involuntarily subterranean versions of events according to the disenfranchised and exploited. History turns out to be increasingly provisional as we widen the aperture to include stories and angles that have been deprived of a platform by the dominant culture; fixed history gives way to fresh and complicated waters as the massaged renditions created to serve and preserve the purposes of contemporary power are wrenched from their monologic state into dialogue.
Ben Quilty is preoccupied with this dialogue and its generative potential as much as with the painful consequences of relegating atrocities to the tidy western notion of an historical past. In his work authoritative History is disturbed and revivified and the paintings are often an uneasy amalgam of conflicting accounts and viewpoints. They embody the reckoning he faces again and again with his ancestral connection to the violence of the colonisers and the oppressors; the history in which he is implicated.
Alien, Cooks death, after Zoffany 2022, as the title suggests is based on Johann Zoffany’s painting The Death of Captain James Cook, 1795. Zoffany’s theatrical depiction is itself derived from the story of Cook’s death at Kealakekua bay Hawaii in 1779 that proliferated in the West in the intervening years in the form of pictures, plays and written accounts. The commemorative painting appears to portray Cook as a martyr, captured in the moment of surprised and somewhat bewildered recognition of his own stabbing. The Hawaiians are depicted decisively as the aggressors with any sign of British wrongdoing and malice omitted from the painting.
‘Alien ’Captain James Cook, bearing gifts of Venereal disease and Tuberculosis from foreign lands was initially mistaken by the Hawaiians to be the god Lono and welcomed with reverence. He had coincidentally arrived at the time the deity was due and his ship’s mast and white sails are said to
have resembled the wood and white bark-cloth associated with the fertility god. However, suspicion about Cook’s godliness swiftly evolved into hostility following Cook’s sudden (un- godlike) return to the island due to storm damage incurred by the ship.
The action of Alien, Cooks death, after Zoffany emanates from a direct mirroring along the central axis. The split widens both visually and metaphorically as divergent versions of the one history painting spread left and right, our eye tracing a compositional loop back to the centre and out again until it feels as if we are caught up in the turbulence of two immense flapping wings. This dynamism is echoed in the mutations occurring in the details; figures morph into a new set of players. Cook’s face on either side is supplanted — on the left by that of Christ derived from Rubens’ painting The entombment, and Quilty’s father on the right with a comic Pinocchio nose. The heroic Captain Cook conveyed by Zoffany, Captain Cook the Martyr slayed ruthlessly by the natives, breaks like a great wave upon the rocks and in the tumult surfaces questions of authority, narrative power, the legacy of colonisation and white man’s attitude towards difference.